IJ study archive

Avril–Orin, and the parentage lattice (compact)

theory

In plain terms: the Avril-Orin question and the family parentage lattice -- whether there was incest, whether Mario is really C.T.'s son, and whether Avril is a "devouring mother."

Where the text lands: an incest-shaped enmeshment is unresolved (and the harder abuse-claim is a stretch); Mario being C.T.'s son is the best-supported reading; the devouring-mother pattern is the best-supported reading as a thematic diagnosis. Among readers: a split leaning toward "something happened"; a near-consensus on Mario's parentage.

The enmeshment is pattern-rich but its one act-channel is hearsay (p. 791). Mario-equals-C.T. draws on C.T.'s own interior thought (pp. 451-452) and birth-timing arithmetic, capped below the top tier by the text's engineered hedge. Hal's paternity, notably, is not engineered as a puzzle the way Mario's is. See Wayne, the AFR & Avril.

The question

This reading answers the crux the Avril–Orin incest question.

The ruling

Weighed in the adversarial ledger Wayne, Avril, and the A.F.R..

Sources

Who takes this reading, and how far they go:

Advanced by

Endorsed by

Entertained by