IJ study archive

Demand and the Appearance of Freedom: The Role of Corporate Media in David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest

source

TL;DR

An early academic essay (c. 2001, hosted on a UC Irvine grad-student page) reading Infinite Jest through media theory — McLuhan, and Robert McChesney's critique of post-1996-Telecommunications-Act media oligopoly. Its thesis is that the novel's near-apocalypse is caused above all by the corporate-media structure and its facilitator P. Tom Veals: the InterLace TelEntertainment monopoly manufactures an "appearance of freedom" (the phrase is the novel's own, endnote 164) that hollows out the citizen's capacity for real choice, and it is this media apparatus, more than the samizdat itself, that creates "the environment in which this eschaton could occur". A genuine piece of Infinite Jest scholarship with a specific, argued reading of the O.N.A.N. backstory: it walks the InterLace origin story (NoCoat → the fall of the Big Four → InterLace → Johnny Gentle's presidency) in detail and keys it to a real endnote concept.

Key claims

  • The televisual-culture frame: "A televisual culture is a culture in which people establish their identities as a direct response to pervasive entertainment and advertising media". Reconfiguring the media outlets reconfigures the culture built as a response to them; "In Infinite Jest, Wallace depicts the detrimental effects of technology-based media reconfigurations on a televisual culture when those reconfigurations are undertaken solely to satisfy market dictates."
  • The "total field" and oligopoly: using McLuhan ("the medium is the message", the broadcast as "total field") and McChesney (Rich Media, Poor Democracy), Kaufman argues that an oligopolistic media market produces homogeneity and forecloses the "third, unstated option," limiting real choice — the Coke/Pepsi logic Wallace himself glosses via Mark Crispin Miller's Pepsi-beach ad in "E Unibus Pluram".
  • The InterLace origin story: the Viney & Veals NoCoat tongue-scraper ads create a hygiene panic and destroy the Big Four networks; from their wreckage P. Tom Veals builds InterLace TelEntertainment, whose campaign attacks cable's "passivity" and sells the teleputer as true "empowerment". Kaufman reads all of this (IJ pp. 410-418) as the manufacture of the "appearance of freedom," not real choice.
  • The endnote hinge: corporate media must appeal to "the American ideology committed to the appearance of freedom," a concept "almost unanalyzably compelling" (the novel's endnote 164). This is the essay's title concept, taken directly from the novel's apparatus.
  • Veals as facilitator, not conspirator: the narrative "does not configure itself around Veals' individual agency"; he resembles Hal's bureaucratic hero, "a virtuoso of triage and compromise and administration" (p. 141). "Veals created an anxiety that could be relieved by purchasing a product or a politician."
  • Johnny Gentle as media-manufactured charisma: Gentle, known unkindly as the "Cleanest Man in Entertainment", with a "paralyzing fear of free-floating contamination", rises on the hygiene panic Veals engineered; Kaufman reads him through Max Weber's charismatic authority, adding the element Weber lacks — corporate media as the mechanism that "delivers the charismatic leader to the population".
  • The causal verdict: "the central factor in creating the environment in which this eschaton could occur is the corporate media structure and its creators, most notably, P. Tom Veals" — an explicit ranking of the media apparatus over the Entertainment cartridge as the novel's engine of collapse.

Theories & evidence

THEORY: The O.N.A.N. near-collapse is caused primarily by the corporate-media apparatus — the InterLace monopoly manufactures an "appearance of freedom" that dissolves real citizenship, and P. Tom Veals is its central agent

  • Crux: appearance-of-freedom
  • Stance: advances
  • Evidence:
    • [text] The full InterLace origin story — NoCoat panic, the Big Four's fall, InterLace's "empowerment" campaign (IJ pp. 410-418, scene 087) — read as engineering the "appearance of freedom." [sec.]
    • [text] The novel's endnote 164 concept, "an American ideology committed to the appearance of freedom," "almost unanalyzably compelling" (n. 164, p. 1031; Kaufman renders it "the American ideology"). [sec.]
    • [text] The novel's "Total freedom, privacy, choice" tag for the Gentle/Lace-Forche millennium (IJ p. 620, scene 121) read as ironized by Veals's authorship of it. [sec.]
    • [inference] Ranks this apparatus above the samizdat as the cause of the eschaton-environment. [sec. conclusion]
  • Notes: A strong causal reading that deliberately brackets the Entertainment's own mechanism ("the actual motivations… are far more complex… but for the purposes of this short summation…") — Kaufman flags his own compression, an in-source qualification kept here. The "appearance of freedom" is the novel's own apparatus language (endnote 164), not the critic's coinage.

THEORY: Johnny Gentle's rise is media-manufactured charisma — corporate media supplies the mechanism (air-time, the engineered hygiene panic) that Weber's theory of the charismatic leader lacks

  • Crux: gentle-electorate
  • Stance: endorses
  • Evidence:
    • [text] Gentle known unkindly as the "Cleanest Man in Entertainment", his C.U.S.P. platform growing from his OCD "paralyzing fear of free-floating contamination" (IJ pp. 381-2, scene 081). [sec.]
    • [secondary] Weber's charismatic-authority model (Economy and Society) supplemented by the corporate-media delivery mechanism Veals controls. [sec.]
    • [inference] Veals's InterLace ties gave Gentle the air-time to rehabilitate his image — "never explicitly stated" but inferable. [sec.]
  • Notes: Kaufman marks the Veals-Gentle air-time link as inference ("Despite the fact that this is never explicitly stated, it can certainly be inferred"), kept as such. Reinforces the disengaged-electorate-elects-a-charismatic-strongman reading with a specifically media-structural mechanism.

Themes

Entertainment and media (the InterLace monopoly, the teleputer, "hot" vs "cool" media); the O.N.A.N. political backstory (Gentle, C.U.S.P., the Great Concavity); freedom and choice (the "appearance of freedom" ideology); advertising and irony (the Pepsi/Miller reading from EUP); the eschaton and its causes. The Hal/Gately plots are noted only as the frame the media crisis connects "on a societal level."

Cross-references

  • The richest treatment among the archive's sources of the corporate-media / O.N.A.N. backstory, in the E Unibus Pluram lineage. Its emphasis on the media structure as cause complements readings of the film's lethality (e.g. claremont-valiunas-king-of-pain) by locating the collapse in the apparatus rather than the cartridge.
  • Novel anchors: scene 044 (Hal's "virtuoso of triage" bureaucratic-hero essay, pp. 140-142), scene 081 (Johnny Gentle / C.U.S.P. backstory, pp. 380-386), scene 087 (the InterLace/Viney & Veals media history, pp. 410-418), scene 121 ("Total freedom, privacy, choice", pp. 620-626), endnote 164 (the "appearance of freedom", p. 1031).

Notable passages

  • "A televisual culture is a culture in which people establish their identities as a direct response to pervasive entertainment and advertising media" (Kaufman).
  • "the central factor in creating the environment in which this eschaton could occur is the corporate media structure and its creators, most notably, P. Tom Veals" (Kaufman).
  • "Veals created an anxiety that could be relieved by purchasing a product or a politician" (Kaufman).
  • "create an anxiety relievable by purchase" (Kaufman, quoting IJ p. 414).

Advances