Avril has real, pre-existing Québécois-separatist ties — but is (probably) not Luria P—
(ties resolve to the lower tier by rule, and the case for the higher tier fails on its own advocate's accounting). The ties are real, stated, documented — and bounded by the anchor's own wording: watchlist-level, graduate-school-era, "however demonstrably nonviolent."
Where readers stand
consensus
ties consensus-where-argued; the identity claim a fading minority (splits ~5/3/3 in the older thread, but every argued rejection since goes unanswered). Avril-dosed-Hal remains unclaimed by any source.
In plain terms: Avril has real, pre-existing Quebecois-separatist ties -- but she is (probably) not the shadowy operative Luria P---.
Where the text lands: the pre-existing ties are the best-supported reading; active collaboration during the main year is unresolved; the Avril-equals-Luria identification is ruled out. Among readers: the ties are agreed where argued; the identity claim is a fading minority.
The watchlist narration (pp. 63-64) is the one unmediated channel for the ties, and it is self-bounding ("however demonstrably nonviolent"). The text carries Avril and "one Mlle. Luria Perec" as two named, separately placed people (pp. 91-92), and Luria's field itinerary is incompatible with Avril's narrated agoraphobia. See Wayne, the AFR & Avril.
The question
This reading answers the crux Avril's separatist involvements.
The ruling
Weighed in the adversarial ledger Wayne, Avril, and the A.F.R..
The evidence
the watchlist footnote; the filmography entry quoted in full as mistaken-identity autobiography; the professional-conversationalist FN's tone