IJ study archive

Acqua in bocca, ovvero Tradurre l’infinito

source

TL;DR

The single fullest account anywhere of how David Foster Wallace reached Italy — a 2013 scholarly essay by the translator Norman Gobetti in the translation-studies journal tradurre (Numero 4, spring 2013). It is a publishing- and translation-HISTORY, chronological and archival, running from Wallace's first Italian appearance (the story Forever Overhead / Per sempre lassù in the magazine Panta, 1993) through his death (2008) and The Pale King (Italian Il re pallido, 2011) to 2013, and it closes with a complete bibliography of the Italian editions. Its archive-load-bearing core is the tangled making of the Fandango 2000 Infinite Jest: Susanna Basso was asked first and declined; Grazia Giua then translated the first 385 pages over nine months (coached by Basso) before a contract-vs-craft rupture; she was replaced by Annalisa Villoresi and the novelist Edoardo Nesi, so that the finished book (10 December 2000) credits, inside, “Edoardo Nesi con la collaborazione di Annalisa Villoresi e Grazia Giua” but, on the cover, only “Traduzione di Edoardo Nesi” — after which Nesi became, in common speech, the translator of Infinite Jest. Around this the essay gathers firsthand craft testimony from the translators (Giua on the boundless traps of the term-density; Nesi on the acrobatic syntax, the coinages, the author's deliberate errors; Giovanna Granato on The Pale King's solidity and its unedited “dirtiness”), a full reception arc (the 72-hour public reading in Rome, December 2000; the shocked Italian response to the 2008 suicide; the debate over Wallace's “beatification” and whether to resist it), and Gobetti's own verdict: a felice paradosso — an author everyone (himself included) thought untranslatable was not only translated but translated to great fortune.

Key claims

The arrival (1993–1998): Wallace enters Italy sideways, through short fiction

  • The first Italian words on Wallace were an editor's blurb. After Pier Vittorio Tondelli's death, Jay McInerney joined the board of the quarterly Panta and edited a 1993 issue on new American narrators; among fifteen then-mostly-untranslated authors it carried Forever Overhead (Per sempre lassù, trans. Edoardo Albinati). McInerney's introduction called Wallace “Uno sperimentatore postmodernista […] furiosamente creativo” (a postmodernist experimenter […] furiously creative — gloss ours), which Gobetti notes are “Sono probabilmente le prime parole mai pubblicate in Italia a proposito di David Foster Wallace” (probably the first words ever published in Italy about DFW — gloss ours).
  • The story converted the future translators. Nesi recounts being struck from the first page — “Io lo capii subito che Wallace era di un’altra categoria rispetto a tutti” (I understood at once that Wallace was of another category than everyone — gloss ours; Consonni 2011). Martina Testa dates her own vocation to reading A Supposedly Fun Thing… in 1998; both would become principal Wallace translators.
  • A scramble of small publishers. While most of Europe wrote Infinite Jest off as untranslatable (Gobetti notes Germany would publish only in 2009, France “non è ancora uscito ed è annunciato per il 2014” — not yet out, announced for 2014 — gloss ours; a datable snapshot), Italy “fu uno dei primi paesi a drizzare le antenne” (was one of the first countries to prick up its ears — gloss ours). minimum fax, Fandango, Einaudi, Fanucci and Codice all took up parts of the œuvre in tangled, overlapping deals.

The making of the Fandango Infinite Jest (the essay's centre)

  • Basso declined; Giua took it on, and cracked open. In autumn 1997 Susanna Basso received the book, judged she could not give it the “lunghissimo tempo e la dedizione assoluta” it needed, and passed it (reserving revision) to Grazia Giua, then a young translator, who over nine months, coached by Basso, faced what she calls “«insidie sconfinate»” (boundless snares — gloss ours). The prose was “enormemente complessa,” forcing her both through the “funambolesche evoluzioni di una sintassi acrobatica” (tightrope evolutions of an acrobatic syntax — gloss ours) and into “una miriade di lessici iperspecialistici” (a myriad of hyper-specialist lexicons — gloss ours).
  • The rupture, and the handoff. Deadline pressure from publisher Domenico Procacci and series editor Sandro Veronesi collided with Giua's need for more time; after she had translated the first 385 pages “con relative torrenziali note” (with attendant torrential notes — gloss ours), she was replaced by Annalisa Villoresi and the writer Edoardo Nesi.
  • The split credit line. The book appeared 10 December 2000. Inside, the translation is credited to “«Edoardo Nesi con la collaborazione di Annalisa Villoresi e Grazia Giua»”; on the cover, only “«Traduzione di Edoardo Nesi».” “Da quel momento nel parlare comune Nesi sarebbe stato il traduttore di Infinite Jest” (from that moment, in common parlance, Nesi would be the translator of Infinite Jest — gloss ours) — a datum on how a collaborative translation gets attributed to one name.
  • What made it hard, from the translators' own mouths. Nesi's public account (Nesi 2001) enumerates: “l’estrema complessità della trama che si supera e si ripiega e si rincorre continuamente” (the extreme complexity of a plot that overtakes, folds back on and chases itself continually — gloss ours); the dozens of vivid characters; “la frequente coniazione di nuove parole in americano” (the frequent coining of new words in American — gloss ours); the decision not to add translator's notes given the author's own hundreds of pages of notes; and “la presenza nel romanzo di numerosissimi refusi d’autore poiché ben pochi dei personaggi sanno parlare o persino pensare in un inglese corretto” (the presence in the novel of very many authorial “typos,” since very few of the characters can speak or even think in correct English — gloss ours). Villoresi's rare testimony (via the Bernacchioni 2000 newspaper piece): “Non è stato facile restituire in italiano lo slang e il particolare stile letterario di Wallace” (it was not easy to render Wallace's slang and particular literary style in Italian — gloss ours).

Reception, death, and the “beatification” debate

  • The Roman apotheosis. Fandango staged a 72-hour non-stop public reading of Infinite Jest at Rome's Cinema Politecnico, 15–17 December 2000, opened by Alessandro Baricco and closed by Fernanda Pivano.
  • The 2008 suicide, and the translators' claims of kinship. Wallace's death (12 September 2008) “ha lasciato scioccata un’intera generazione di lettori” (left a whole generation of readers shocked — gloss ours; Lagioia 2008); his Italian editors each claimed a kind of primacy — Procacci: Fandango “è nata per pubblicare un suo lavoro, il monumentale Infinite Jest” (was born to publish one of his works, the monumental Infinite Jest — gloss ours); Veronesi: “Io credo che Infinite Jest sia il più grande romanzo che sia stato scritto nel dopoguerra” (I believe Infinite Jest is the greatest novel written since the war — gloss ours).
  • Resisting the cult. Against the “«beatificazione»” (beatification — gloss ours; Salis's term) of a writer who had moved from ironist-epigone toward “una concezione morale, se non esplicitamente spirituale, della letteratura” (a moral, if not explicitly spiritual, conception of literature — gloss ours), Einaudi and translators pushed back: Martina Testa thought it wrong “connotarlo come una specie di unicum, di “monstrum”, di prodigio” (to brand him a kind of unicum, monstrum, prodigy — gloss ours); Giovanna Granato: “«È un errore farne un culto perché non era l’immagine che lui voleva dare di sé»” (it is a mistake to make a cult of him because it was not the image he wanted to give of himself — gloss ours).
  • The Pale King as a different order of difficulty. Granato, who translated Il re pallido (2011), found the sentences no longer the problem — “Le sue architetture verbali sono di una solidità mostruosa” (his verbal architectures are of a monstrous solidity — gloss ours), “Affrontare la lunghezza delle frasi è solo una cosa muscolare” (facing the length of the sentences is merely a muscular matter — gloss ours) — but the unfinished text's “dirtiness,” left uncorrected, made translating it “come mettere le mani nella carne viva” (like putting one's hands into living flesh — gloss ours).

Gobetti's verdict

  • A happy paradox. Twenty years after Wallace's Italian debut, Gobetti closes that “Ci troviamo di fronte a un felice paradosso: un autore che molti consideravano intraducibile (e che si considerava intraducibile)” (we face a happy paradox: an author many considered untranslatable, and who considered himself untranslatable — gloss ours) was “non solo tradotto ma tradotto con grandissima fortuna” (not only translated but translated with the greatest good fortune — gloss ours) — a challenge that, for all the tortuous editorial history, “i traduttori hanno vinto” (the translators won — gloss ours).

Theories & evidence

(This is a publishing- and translation-history essay, not a close-reading of the prose. It advances no interpretive theory about any plot or ending crux. The blocks below record the cruxes the essay's craft- and reception-material genuinely touches; grades are honest to what the text argues. The bulk of the essay — the editorial history itself — is reception/publishing-scoped with no home slug: see the last block and do-not-coin.)

CONNECTION: Wallace's “typos” are design — the novel is riddled with authorial refusi because its characters cannot speak or even think in correct English, a translator's assertion that the errors are deliberate characterization

  • Crux: intentional-errors
  • Stance: endorses
  • Evidence:
    • [T — IT] Nesi's enumerated difficulties (Nesi 2001) end on “la presenza nel romanzo di numerosissimi refusi d’autore poiché ben pochi dei personaggi sanno parlare o persino pensare in un inglese corretto” (the presence in the novel of very many authorial “typos,” since very few of the characters can speak or even think in correct English — gloss ours) — errors framed as character-motivated design, not accident. [Nesi 2001, the difficulties list]
    • [G] The countervailing datum: among the 2013 forthcoming editions is a new Infinite Jest “in cui sono stati corretti i numerosi refusi presenti nelle edizioni cartacee” (in which the numerous typos present in the print editions have been corrected — gloss ours) — e-book only, a foretaste of the planned 2016 twentieth-anniversary edition — i.e. some refusi were treated as correctable errata. [closing survey of forthcoming editions]
    • [T — IT] Granato's Pale King rule (Granato 2013): with an unfinished, un-cleaned text she chose “di non correggere anche laddove evidentemente Wallace in un secondo tempo sarebbe intervenuto” (not to correct even where Wallace would evidently later have intervened — gloss ours) — a translator's fidelity to the “dirty” text as document. [on translating Il re pallido]
  • Notes: The sharpest crux-contact in the essay, and the reason it is worth more than reception texture: a translator's assertion that Wallace's errors are deliberate, motivated by character-voice — convergent with the archive's intentional-errors lane (which already holds blumenbach-spiegel-2009's craft testimony that the errors are deliberate; the Byzantine-erotica / Québécois-spelling candidate rows). But it arrives with a tension any future adjudication must weigh: Nesi attributes the refusi to design while the announced 2016 edition “corrects” them as errata — the source itself does not distinguish designed-error from print-erratum, and neither should we without adjudication (the lane's OPEN-per-error posture fits). Graded endorses for the Nesi character-motivated-error claim, with the erratum-vs-design conflation logged. No individual error is located here; this is a general craft assertion, not a per-error argument.

CONNECTION: The translators' desk testimony to Infinite Jest's encyclopedic, term-loaded construction — physics and math compendia, tennis and football manuals, drug references, film dictionaries, and interviews with informants on both sides of the ocean

  • Crux: encyclopedic-design
  • Stance: mentions
  • Evidence:
    • [T — IT] Giua's account (Giua 2008) of the research the prose forced: “Centinaia di pagine di appunti, centinaia, molte, di mail” (hundreds of pages of notes, hundreds, many, of emails — gloss ours) plus “compendi di fisica, di matematica, manuali sul tennis e sul football americano” (compendia of physics, of mathematics, manuals on tennis and American football — gloss ours), the Physician's Desk Reference, film dictionaries, and “i colloqui infiniti e meravigliosi con gli informant” (the endless and wonderful conversations with informants — gloss ours). [Giua 2008, on the term-density]
    • [T — IT] Nesi (Nesi 2001) on “le lunghe dissertazioni tennistiche e farmacologiche e chimiche e cinematografiche con uso continuo di termini specialistici” (the long tennis, pharmacological, chemical and cinematographic disquisitions with continuous use of specialist terms — gloss ours). [Nesi 2001]
    • [G] The physical fact: the English IJ is “1079 pagine, 388 note” (1,079 pages, 388 notes — gloss ours). [publication description]
  • Notes: Reception/craft-scoped support for the encyclopedic-design reading, attested from the translators' desks — the same term-density testimony the German and Italian translator notes already hold (Blumenbach's encyclopedic dictionaries; Nesi's fax on American products/TV). A mentions: the translators describe the density; none argues here what it is for. A sighting only.

CONNECTION: Wallace's acrobatic syntax and monstrous sentence-architecture as a register the translator must rebuild — the maximal sentence as a craft fact reported from the desk

  • Crux: prose-tempo-design
  • Stance: mentions
  • Evidence:
    • [T — IT] Giua on the syntax: the prose forced her to retrace “le funambolesche evoluzioni di una sintassi acrobatica” (the tightrope evolutions of an acrobatic syntax — gloss ours). [Giua 2012 / the translation account]
    • [T — IT] Granato on The Pale King: “Le sue architetture verbali sono di una solidità mostruosa” (his verbal architectures are of a monstrous solidity — gloss ours), so that “Affrontare la lunghezza delle frasi è solo una cosa muscolare” (facing the length of the sentences is merely a muscular matter — gloss ours). [Granato 2013]
  • Notes: A mentions-grade sighting on the register-only translator-craft tier prose-tempo-design already carries (adjudication #13, REGISTER-ONLY). The translators speak to the syntax's difficulty and solidity; neither argues the maximal sentence as a designed tempo (the crux's question) — a mention-level sighting only. Consonant with the blumenbach/nesi sentence-craft evidence tier.

CONNECTION: The 388-note apparatus and Nesi's decision not to gloss — the endnote mass as a translator's constraint

  • Crux: endnotes-function
  • Stance: mentions
  • Evidence:
    • [G] The apparatus named as a physical fact: “388 note” (388 notes — gloss ours). [publication description]
    • [T — IT] Nesi (Nesi 2001) reports “la decisione di non aggiungere note di traduzione non assolutamente necessarie per via delle moltissime pagine di note al testo già scritte dall’autore” (the decision not to add translator's notes not strictly necessary, because of the very many pages of notes to the text already written by the author — gloss ours). [Nesi 2001]
  • Notes: A mentions: the endnote mass is named and Nesi's no-gloss decision is recorded, but no argument about what the notes are for is made here. The archive's held nesi-minimaetmoralia-intervista carries the FULLER endnotes-function datum — Nesi's fax-drawn Wallace stance (don't gloss; let the reader stop and look a term up) — from a DIFFERENT interview; this essay has only the bare decision. Log as an adjacency to that stronger sighting, not a reading of its own.

CONNECTION: Wallace's move from ironist-epigone toward a moral, near-spiritual conception of literature, and the Italian resistance to “beatifying” him

  • Crux: sincerity-definition
  • Stance: mentions
  • Evidence:
    • [G] Gobetti's framing: a writer once taken for “un ironico acrobata delle parole” (an ironic acrobat of words — gloss ours; Bajani 1999) who “si era spostato sempre più verso una concezione morale, se non esplicitamente spirituale, della letteratura” (had moved ever more toward a moral, if not explicitly spiritual, conception of literature — gloss ours). [the “beatificazione” passage]
    • [X — via Gobetti's translation] Heller's answer (Heller 2011, “traduzione mia”): Wallace was “l’intellettuale del 21° secolo che ha insegnato ai lettori a provare sentimenti” (the 21st-century intellectual who taught readers to feel — gloss ours). [Slate, in Gobetti's Italian]
    • [T — IT] The counter-move: Testa and Granato resist the cult (see Key claims); Einaudi “preferì non incoraggiare ulteriormente una lettura di Wallace che molti ritengono fuorviante” (preferred not to further encourage a reading of Wallace that many hold misleading — gloss ours).
  • Notes: Oeuvre-scoped, mentions-grade reception on the earnest/moral Wallace against the ironist framing — consonant with the archive's large sincerity-definition lane. Gobetti reports the debate; he does not adjudicate a definition. Sighting only.

CONNECTION: The editorial history itself — the tangled making, attribution, and canonization of Wallace's Italian editions

  • Crux: (no home slug — translation/publishing-history)
  • Stance: n/a (reception/publishing texture)
  • Evidence:
    • [G] The split credit line (“«Edoardo Nesi con la collaborazione di Annalisa Villoresi e Grazia Giua»” inside; “«Traduzione di Edoardo Nesi»” on the cover) and “Da quel momento nel parlare comune Nesi sarebbe stato il traduttore di Infinite Jest” (from that moment Nesi would in common speech be the translator — gloss ours). [the publication account]
    • [G] The felice-paradosso conclusion: an untranslatable author “non solo tradotto ma tradotto con grandissima fortuna” (not only translated but translated with the greatest good fortune — gloss ours). [closing]
  • Notes: The essay's true subject — the four-translator handoff, the 385-page rupture, the publisher scramble, the death-week claims of primacy, the beatification debate — is reception/publishing-history-scoped and has NO home slug (the archive holds no translation/publishing/legacy slug). This is the same do-not-coin finding all six landed nonenglish notes reached. NOT a fold; NOT a coinage.

Themes

The publishing and translation history of David Foster Wallace in Italy (the Panta debut; the small-publisher scramble — minimum fax, Fandango, Einaudi, Fanucci, Codice; the tangled rights and the Girl with Curious Hair / La ragazza… double-edition saga); the making of the Fandango Infinite Jest (Basso's decline; Giua's nine months and first 385 pages; the contract-vs-craft rupture; the Villoresi/Nesi handoff; the split credit line); translation as visible labour and its traps (the “insidie sconfinate”; the acrobatic syntax; the hyper-specialist lexicons; the research through compendia, manuals, the PDR, film dictionaries and informants); Wallace's deliberate authorial errors as character-voice (the refusi d’autore; the 2016 “corrected” edition; Granato's fidelity to the “dirty” Pale King); the endnote apparatus and the no-gloss decision; the difficulty-as-reputation arc (untranslatable-yet-translated; the 72-hour Roman reading; the cult of the Howling Fantods era); Wallace's death and the Italian mourning (the shocked generation of readers; the editors' claims of kinship); and the moral/spiritual “beatification” debate and the translators' resistance to it.

Cross-references

  • nesi-minimaetmoralia-intervista — the direct sibling: a held interview with Edoardo Nesi, the translator this essay makes central. The two do NOT share a source — this essay quotes Nesi from Nesi 1996 (trax.it), Nesi 2001 (L’Indice) and Consonni 2011 (lankelot.eu), whereas the held note is the 2022 minima&moralia (Bocchio) interview. They overlap thematically (both recount Nesi's Panta / Forever Overhead epiphany; both touch the no-translator's-notes decision), but the wording and sources differ — do not conflate; each note's quotes are byte-authoritative only for its own source. This essay ADDS the collaborators' story (Giua's 385 pages; Villoresi; the split credit) the held Nesi interview omits.
  • esposito-ij-around-the-world — the cross-language reception companion: Esposito's round-up covers the Italian IJ's reception (the “cult for difficult writers,” the love-framing, long-tail sales) but not the granular translator history; this essay is the deep Italian-history source it gestures at — its reception companion on the Italian side.
  • The translator-testimony cluster — blumenbach-trashpool-2011, blumenbach-spiegel-2009, mokita-blumenbach-passage-2017, kerline-books-2015 — the German/French desk-craft parallels on IJ's term-density and syntax; mokita is the closest craft parallel (a translator walking specific renderings), though this Gobetti essay stays at the level of reported difficulty, not passage-comparison. The intentional-errors contact here is the direct companion to blumenbach-spiegel-2009's errors-are-deliberate craft testimony.
  • lapresse-infinie-comedie-2015 / letraslibres-no-necrologica-2008 — the French and Spanish non-English reception primaries; adjacency as fellow translated-culture reception sources.
  • Held-English resolution neighbours — miller-1996-salon-interview and lipsky-becoming-yourself: this essay back-translates Wallace's Salon-1996 words and Lipsky's words into Italian; the English originals live in those held sources; any English-verbatim use resolves there, never to the Italian renderings here.

Notable passages

Gobetti's words unless marked; Italian is the verbatim anchor, the English in parentheses is our gloss (paraphrase). Curly Italian typography reproduced as printed (U+2019 ’; … guillemets; curly “…” for scare-quotes/nested). Most quoted matter is THIRD-PARTY — translators, editors, critics carried by Gobetti; it is quotable as this essay's rendering, NOT as the speaker's independently-verified verbatim. Speaker attributions are as the essay gives them.

  • Gobetti: “Ci troviamo di fronte a un felice paradosso: un autore che molti consideravano intraducibile (e che si considerava intraducibile)” … “non solo tradotto ma tradotto con grandissima fortuna” (a happy paradox: an author many — himself included — thought untranslatable, not only translated but translated with the greatest good fortune — gloss ours).
  • Gobetti, on the split credit: inside, “«Edoardo Nesi con la collaborazione di Annalisa Villoresi e Grazia Giua»”; on the cover, “«Traduzione di Edoardo Nesi»” — “Da quel momento nel parlare comune Nesi sarebbe stato il traduttore di Infinite Jest” (from that moment Nesi would in common speech be the translator — gloss ours).
  • Grazia Giua (Giua 2008): “Centinaia di pagine di appunti, centinaia, molte, di mail” and “compendi di fisica, di matematica, manuali sul tennis e sul football americano” (hundreds of pages of notes… compendia of physics, mathematics, tennis and football manuals — gloss ours); the work posed “«insidie sconfinate»” (boundless snares — gloss ours).
  • Edoardo Nesi (Nesi 2001): the difficulties included “l’estrema complessità della trama che si supera e si ripiega e si rincorre continuamente” (the extreme complexity of a plot that overtakes, folds and chases itself — gloss ours), “la frequente coniazione di nuove parole in americano” (the frequent coining of new words in American — gloss ours), and “la presenza nel romanzo di numerosissimi refusi d’autore poiché ben pochi dei personaggi sanno parlare o persino pensare in un inglese corretto” (the very many authorial typos, since few characters can speak or even think in correct English — gloss ours).
  • Annalisa Villoresi (via Bernacchioni 2000): “Non è stato facile restituire in italiano lo slang e il particolare stile letterario di Wallace” (it was not easy to render Wallace's slang and particular literary style in Italian — gloss ours).
  • Giovanna Granato (Granato 2013): “Le sue architetture verbali sono di una solidità mostruosa” … “Affrontare la lunghezza delle frasi è solo una cosa muscolare” (his verbal architectures are of a monstrous solidity… facing the length of the sentences is merely muscular — gloss ours); The Pale King was “come mettere le mani nella carne viva” (like putting one's hands into living flesh — gloss ours).
  • Martina Testa (Testa 2012): to brand Wallace “una specie di unicum, di “monstrum”, di prodigio” is “inopportuno” (inappropriate — gloss ours). Giovanna Granato (Granato 2013): “«È un errore farne un culto perché non era l’immagine che lui voleva dare di sé»” (it is a mistake to make a cult of him — gloss ours).
  • Nicola Lagioia (Lagioia 2008): the suicide “ha lasciato scioccata un’intera generazione di lettori” (left a whole generation of readers shocked — gloss ours).
  • Domenico Procacci (Procacci 2008): Fandango “è nata per pubblicare un suo lavoro, il monumentale Infinite Jest” (was born to publish the monumental IJ — gloss ours). Sandro Veronesi (Veronesi 2008): “Io credo che Infinite Jest sia il più grande romanzo che sia stato scritto nel dopoguerra” (the greatest novel written since the war — gloss ours).
  • Michiko Kakutani (Kakutani 1996, “traduzione mia” — Gobetti's Italian of the NYT English): “«uno scrittore dal talento virtuosistico che sembra in grado di fare qualunque cosa»” (a writer of virtuoso talent who seems able to do anything — gloss ours). [back-translation — English original not held; Gobetti's rendering.]
  • [novel, Italian translation] the epigraph, from the Italian IJ (p. 1144): “La vita è come il tennis vince chi serve meglio” (life is like tennis, whoever serves best wins — gloss ours) — the Nesi/Giua/Villoresi rendering of the novel's church sign (printed in all caps, seen on Hal's blizzard morning late in the novel); the novel's English line, not this Italian, is the quotable original.

Accuracy notes

Cite-as-written throughout (orthography and typography preserved as printed).

  • The Villoresi-source periodical disagrees with its own bibliography. The body attributes Villoresi's testimony to the masthead «Tirreno» (line 339, “dal «Tirreno» il 23 dicembre 2000”), but the works-cited entry Bernacchioni 2000 gives «Il Mattino», 23 dicembre 2000 (line 1098). Same author, same date, different masthead — reproduced as printed; a source-internal inconsistency, not ours.
  • Gobetti's own [sic] inside a quotation. Within the Bernacchioni block, Gobetti inserts “[sic, ma Grazia Giua non è romana]” (line 346) — flagging that the newspaper wrongly called the previous translator “romana” (Roman); Giua is not Roman. The bracketed correction is Gobetti's editorial insertion into the quoted matter, reproduced as printed.
  • Page/note figures. The English IJ is given as “1079 pagine, 388 note” (line 203); the Italian edition's epigraph cites “p. 1144” (line 107). Both reproduced as printed.
  • “Wexter” for Wexler. At line 194 the citation reads “(Wexter e Hulme 1995, 39)”; the bibliography and the rest of the essay spell it “Wexler” (lines 971, 1352). Reproduced as printed (cite-as-written); a source typo.
  • The “‘69” apostrophes are LEFT single quotes. In the bibliography, “Crash of ‘69” / “Crollo del ‘69” (lines 977, 979) use U+2018 (left single quote) for the year elision, where an apostrophe would be U+2019; reproduced byte-true.
  • Biographical / factual spot-checks. Infinite Jest published 1 February 1996 (line 202) — correct; the death dated 12 September 2008 (line 507) — correct; the Kenyon commencement dated 15 May 2005 (line 597) — correct; the 72-hour Rome reading 15–17 December 2000 (lines 399–400) — as stated. All reproduced as the essay gives them.
  • “il coraggio” is a drifted rendering in the Salon back-translation. In Gobetti's Italian of Wallace's Salon-1996 sentence, “la ricchezza e il coraggio e la difficoltà emotiva e intellettuale dell’avanguardia” renders the English's “richness and challenge and emotional and intellectual difficulty” — “coraggio” (courage) stands where Wallace said “challenge.” Reproduced as printed; the English original is the interview, which is quote authority for any English use.