the Sherman Act with spike heels
this was partly to forestall A.C.D.C.’s appellate-court claims that InterLace was basically hopping up and down on the B.S. 1890 Sherman Act with spike heels
Context
The monopoly's antitrust flank, load-bearing for n301: InterLace's Read-Only regime also served "to forestall A.C.D.C.'s appellate-court claims that InterLace was basically hopping up and down on the B.S. 1890 Sherman Act with spike heels." The same anti-broadcast coalition (A.C.D.C., funded by the Québec-sympathetic Albertan mogul, n204) that fights InterLace's monopoly links the media-law to the pan-Canadian insurgency financing — the antitrust suit and the samizdat share an adversary.