Death Was Not the End: David Foster Wallace Ten Years Later — A Tribute to the Tumultuous Life and Writings of David Foster Wallace on his 57th Birthday

source

TL;DR

A first-person tribute essay published on DFW's 57th birthday (2019-02-21) by Hannah Smart, a graduating Middlebury senior who is now developing a DFW biography — so her exact phrasings are archive-valuable as an early sample of that biographer's voice and reading. The piece is pure tribute and personal reflection built on a biographical/autobiographical reading of Wallace's whole body of work: it frames the BIWHM story "Death is not the End" as DFW describing his own feared future self, argues his fiction contains no healthy relationships and that every character "is in some way him," and reads her own looming post-college future through "Forever Overhead." It advances no interpretive theory scoped to an IJ plot or interpretation crux (no hal-dmz, wraith, ending, structure, etc.), so per the lens the ## Theories & evidence section is omitted; its interpretive moves are biographical/aesthetic and are recorded as Key claims.

Key claims

Autobiographical reading of "Death is not the End": the "fifty-six-year-old American poet" of the BIWHM story is Wallace "clearly describing himself, or more likely some hellish, futuristic caricature of himself" (she invites the reader to "replace 'poet' with 'writer'"), keyed to "the fears and insecurities he had about not being able to write anymore and forever living in the shadow of his earlier accomplishments". [¶2]
The "in real time" coincidence: she read that story in October 2018, which would have been "exactly 'four months short of'" Wallace's 57th birthday (the same age-marker the story's poet carries), giving her the surreal sense of "reading about what David Foster Wallace feared he would become by this point in his life, in real time." She calls that day "the closest thing to a 'spiritual experience' I've ever had," while stating she doesn't believe in fate and isn't superstitious. [¶2–¶3]
Reader-communion / anti-solipsism: reading DFW gives "the startling but strangely comforting sensation of not being alone in my own mind" — the first time since reading The Catcher in the Rye in high school; she reports reading Infinite Jest "last summer". [¶4]
No healthy relationships in the oeuvre (critical generalization): Wallace has "never written a single healthy relationship into any of his stories or novels"; across his fiction (the Incandenzas, the Beadsmens, "the married couple in the comically absurd 'Oblivion'", the subjects of Brief Interviews With Hideous Men), from familial to romantic to platonic, all relationships are "strained, tortured, obsessive, toxic, or... several or all of the above." [¶5]
Biographical inference from the above: this "leads one to wonder whether DFW himself had ever even experienced a truly healthy relationship," and "anecdotal evidence" — she cites the New Yorker piece "The Unfinished" — "seems to suggest the contrary," his own life and interpersonal interactions "mirroring those of his most beloved yet flawed characters." [¶5]
Fiction-as-self: "every single character and interaction in his fiction is in some way him," grounded in his "painful self-awareness"; "the writings of DFW the author are inextricably tied to the experiences of David Wallace the person." [¶5]
Reader-identification examples: she found herself sympathizing with "the recovering drug addict and ex-criminal Don Gately", then with "the obsessive, neurotic Rick Vigorous of The Broom of the System" (handcuffing himself to Lenore Beadsman in the Great Ohio Desert to stop her leaving); reading "Good Old Neon" (protagonist spends "nearly 40 pages" explaining he is a fraud and must kill himself) made her wonder if she is a fraud. [¶6]
Ordinary-in-the-extraordinary: though a "diagnosed 'genius' and prodigy" with severe mental-health issues, Wallace "chose not to focus on those extraordinary aspects" but to "recognize, highlight, and illustrate the ordinary parts of the universal human experience in the extraordinary way only he could." [¶7]
Late-life biography: "He calmed down a lot towards the end. He settled down and got married, he sobered up, and he seemed genuinely hopeful about his future." She cites a 2004 San Francisco interview in which he says he's "looking forward to his fifties", calling it heartbreaking in hindsight; his suicide followed "a long battle with depression that began when he was in college and never, even after 25 years of intense treatment, hospitalizations, and medications, truly eased up." [¶8]
"Forever Overhead" as master frame: "all of his writing is about the metaphorical realities of what he literally wrote about in 'Forever Overhead'" — "the anxiety and discomfort and sometimes even pain that comes with facing the unknown"; she stages her own imminent post-college future as that story's diving-board edge, struggling to "deploy the life-saving parachute," and credits Wallace with making "the drop seem like little more than a ten-foot drop into a cool swimming pool on a scorching summer's day." [¶4, ¶9–¶10]

Themes

Communication-and-solipsism (the reader "not being alone in my own mind"; the comfort of "someone is reading your mind"); the-self / authenticity (the "Good Old Neon" fraud spiral); addiction-and-recovery (identification with Gately); family-and-relationships (the no-healthy-relationships generalization); autobiography-in-fiction (every character "in some way him"); mortality and facing-the-unknown ("Forever Overhead"). Note: the essay's center of gravity is Wallace's oeuvre and life as a whole, not Infinite Jest specifically; IJ enters only via Gately and the read-IJ-last-summer datum.

Cross-references

Don Gately — cited as the character she first identified with (recovering addict / ex-criminal); the essay's only concrete IJ character reference.
The Incandenzas — name-checked in the no-healthy-relationships claim (as a family whose relationships she reads as strained/toxic).
Non-IJ works referenced: Brief Interviews With Hideous Men ("Death is not the End", "Forever Overhead"), Oblivion ("Good Old Neon", "Oblivion"), The Broom of the System (Rick Vigorous, Lenore Beadsman), and the "This is Water" Kenyon commencement address (photo caption).
External sources the essay cites: the New Yorker's "The Unfinished" (D.T. Max — digested at dtmax-2009-the-unfinished; the attribution to Max is archive knowledge, the essay names only the piece), invoked as biographical "anecdotal evidence"; a 2004 San Francisco DFW interview on YouTube.
Provenance (per the archived header, not the essay body): the I Hate Infinite Jest ep. 23 show notes point to this article; same author as the 2026-03-26 an online forum AMA (thread [community thread] — digested at general online discussion) and the LARB Mister Squishy essay.

Notable passages

Verbatim from the essay (her own phrasings kept for the biography-source archive; where she quotes Wallace, the quote is recorded as her quotation, cite-as-written). Locator key: [¶N] counts blank-line-delimited paragraphs of the archived.txt. Two run-together spacings in the archived text ("any hole.So cry", "Yes and no.Hey kid.") are normalized below as scrape/paste artifacts, not source readings.

On the coincidence: "I don't believe in fate, and I'm not superstitious, but that moment was the closest thing to a 'spiritual experience' I've ever had. That day, more than anything else, I felt like I was reading something that had been written for me at that exact moment." [¶3]
On reading DFW / IJ: "I read Infinite Jest last summer, and for the first time since reading The Catcher in the Rye in high school, I experienced the startling but strangely comforting sensation of not being alone in my own mind." [¶4]
The oeuvre claim: "he's never written a single healthy relationship into any of his stories or novels... all of these relationships are strained, tortured, obsessive, toxic, or, in the vast majority of cases, several or all of the above." [¶5]
Fiction-as-self: "The man's painful self-awareness is apparent in the fact that every single character and interaction in his fiction is in some way him." [¶5]
On the reader-mind sensation: "That sensation that someone is reading your mind — that there's someone else in your head who not only knows exactly what you're going through at any given moment but can also articulate that feeling so much more eloquently and coherently than you ever could — is a comforting one, and it never gets old." [¶7]
Late-life / suicide: "The man who wrote about the painful realities of living and being human and has helped me face those realities was unable to handle them himself and chose to end his life after a long battle with depression that began when he was in college..." [¶8]
Her quotation of the BIWHM poet passage (opening; abridged with bracketed ellipses in the source): "A fifty-six-year-old American poet, a Nobel laureate, […] ... an eminent American poet now four months short of his fifty-seventh birthday, ... […] ... reading his magazine in his chair on his deck by his pool behind his home." (attributed by the essay to "Brief Interviews with Hideous Men p. 2-3") [¶2]
Her quotation of "Good Old Neon": "Of course you're a fraud, of course what people see is never you... it's not English anymore, it's not getting squeezed through any hole. So cry all you want, I won't tell anybody." (attributed by the essay to "Oblivion, p. 179-80") [¶6]
Closing quote and footnote conceit: "'Happy birthday. Did you think it over? Yes and no. Hey kid.'*" — with the footnote noting the citation was held out of the main text "to honor David Foster Wallace's famous tradition of using lengthy and copious footnotes", attributed to "'Forever Overhead,' page 14 of Brief Interviews with Hideous Men (1999)." [¶11, footnote]