IJ study archive

Hal watches Accomplice!, the blizzard coverage (pp. 946–947)

quote

why so much aesthetically ambitious film was so boring and why so much shitty reductive commercial entertainment was so much fun

Context

The tenure essay Hal cites accidentally states the theme's governing riddle. In "the teleputer age of home-only entertainment," the central conundrum is why ambitious art bores and reductive trash delights — and the whole book is an answer, because the fun of the reductive is the fun of self-forgetting (asking nothing of the watcher, letting the self dissolve) while the boredom of the ambitious is the discomfort of self-confronting (forcing the watcher to remain present, to think, to feel the excruciation of Accomplice!). The Entertainment is the terminal solution to the riddle: maximally fun because maximally self-erasing, the shitty-reductive pleasure pushed to a lethality no ambitious film could achieve. The academic frames it as a paradox; the novel treats it as a diagnosis of a population that has come to experience its own presence as the thing to be escaped.

In anthology