IJ study archive

Pages 78–79

Y.D.A.U. — Kate Gompert · first-time reader guide · all scenes

When you've finished these pages: three things worth a second look, at the bottom.

One sentence long — the book's shortest scene so far. Boston, just before 0145h on 2 April, Year of the Depend Adult Undergarment: the medical attaché's wife arrives home from her Wednesday night out — she was last seen at 0015h leaving her tennis club's members' lounge (p. 54) — and finds her husband where he's been since yesterday evening: in the special recliner, in front of the cartridge-viewer. Both people are known quantities by now; no one new appears. The scene exists to advance a clock and to turn one head.

Terms, in order of appearance

  • 0145h. (p. 78) — 24-hour military time, the attaché sections' house style: 1:45 a.m.
  • rictus (p. 79) — real word: a fixed, gaping grimace.
  • cartridge-viewer (p. 79) — the TP's screen; the home-entertainment apparatus inventoried back on pp. 33–34.
After you read: three things

1. Do the clock math. He got home at "like 1840h." on 1 April (p. 35) and settled in front of the unlabelled cartridge that evening. The book has since checked in on him "still watching" at 2010h. (p. 42), then at 0020h. (p. 54) — recliner already wet, the cartridge configured "for a recursive loop." Now it's nearly 0145h. on 2 April. This is the latest frame in that time-lapse, and the first with a second person in the room.

2. One sentence, and the grammar is the event. "[E]ventually and naturally" comes around twice, wrapping the wife's movement until it reads like plain physics: she cries his name, touches his head, gets nothing — and the sentence steers her gaze along "his line of sight to the cartridge-viewer." The scene stops at the exact instant her eyes arrive. That's the whole event; the book stops exactly there on purpose.

3. Mind the gap between what happens and how it's told. A crying wife, an unresponsive husband, a soiled chair — and the narrator's aside that the man's face "appeared very positive, ecstatic, even, you could say." That "you could say" shrug is deliberate: something plainly terrible reported in the mild, accommodating voice these sections have used since p. 33. The mismatch is yours to feel; the prose won't feel it for you. And note what the scene withholds: the cartridge itself is never described — only faces that have seen it.


Written only from this scene and earlier pages. Safe to read before you start.