IJ study archive

Pages 27–32

1 April, Year of the Tucks Medicated Pad — the professional conversationalist · first-time reader guide · all scenes

When you've finished these pages: three things worth a second look, at the bottom.

The header gives you a full date for the first time — 1 APRIL, YEAR OF THE TUCKS MEDICATED PAD — and Hal is ten, going on eleven: the book is openly shuffling its timeline now, and the named years don't yet reveal their order. Hal has biked uphill to a rented office with a blank door to see a man calling himself a professional conversationalist. Nobody new to track beyond these two. The format is the difficulty and the point: dialogue only, no narration at all — even the soda-opening and burps arrive as transcribed sound. What you can know is exactly what gets said.

Terms, in order of appearance

  • Year of the Tucks Medicated Pad (p. 27) — third named year; Tucks is a real brand of hemorrhoid pad.
  • Byzantine erotica (p. 29) — racy mosaics of the Eastern Roman Empire; an established Hal interest (see the p. 7 essay title on Justinian erotica).
  • amanuensis (p. 30) — one who takes dictation; a literary secretary.
  • alpenstock (p. 30) — long iron-tipped mountaineering staff.
  • jew’s-ear / jew’s-harp (p. 30) — real consecutive O.E.D. entries: a tree fungus; a small mouth-held twanging instrument. Hal is reading the dictionary in order.
  • Jivaro (p. 30) — real Amazonian people, famed for shrunken heads; here relocated, absurdly, to "the South-Central L.A. basin."
  • mise-en-scène (p. 31) — film term: everything staged inside the frame.
  • priapistic (p. 31) — from priapism: persistent erection; from the god Priapus.
  • anaplastic (p. 31) — medical: of cells gone undifferentiated, malignant.
  • Interdependence Day (p. 31) — a holiday; the extra syllable on Independence is the tell, and no explanation is offered.
  • Mondragonoid (p. 31) — adjective built from a proper name the scene doesn't supply.
After you read: three things

1. You're meant to solve the disguise along with Hal — and he's ahead of you. The conversationalist knows Hal's private interests, uses the family's own verbal tics, and is physically coming apart: mustache askew, "your whole face is kind of running" (p. 30). Hal closes the case on the stained argyle: "Is this April Fools, Dad, or do I need to call the Moms and C.T.?" (p. 31). No narrator ever confirms it; Hal's call is all the confirmation the scene gives.

2. Two silences stare at each other. The father's premise is that Hal never speaks — yet Hal talks fluently the entire scene, and says so: "It speaks. It accepts soda and defines implore" (pp. 31–32). Then, in the final exchanges, Hal's lines become "…" on the page. A boy whose speech isn't heard by the person in front of him: you have watched this exact problem before, from inside, in the interview room (pp. 3–17).

3. Hal lays a floor of fact under the rant. Keep what Hal says: Himself is the family's name for Dad — the p. 16 umbrella now has an owner — the Moms is their mother, and Dad, a towering figure in avant-garde film who "single-handedly founded the Enfield Tennis Academy" (p. 30) — the interview's unnamed founder (p. 8) — drinks at 5 A.M. and hallucinates. The rant's own content (Québec intrigue, infidelities, implants) arrives as paranoia, and the scene gives you no way to grade its truth. Hold it as heard, not as fact.


Written only from this scene and earlier pages. Safe to read before you start.