what the childhood mold-eating is (cause / red herring / late addition) — cross-listed under composition
This asks what to make of the childhood mold Hal eats: a genuine cause of his later condition, a red herring, or a late-added detail that only looks causal. It is contested because the scene was demonstrably added late in the writing, which some readers argue disqualifies it as the real cause while others treat the very ambiguity as the design.
Adjudication
This crux has an adversarial ledger: The Book's Composition. The per-reading verdicts are below.
Theories on this crux
| Reading | Verdict |
|---|---|
| The post-1993 stratum (late-additions) — and the mold scene as late-addition red herring | strongly-supported |
| Minor structure & design cruxes | favored |
Discussed in
- Community book club 4
- IJ Book Club Ep. 09: All good parties have a line for the bathroom — Ennet House grounds, the halfway-house wisdom list, tattoos, DMZ logistics, and Joelle's last party (from p. ~193, page ref ASR-derived)
- IJ Book Club Ep. 22 (S2 Ep 2): The Back-Door Slip — the government-side samizdat briefing, the Avril/Wayne tableau, Lenz & Green, the hand-model scene with endnote 234, and Arslanian's fusion lecture (pp. ~548–575)
- IJ Book Club Ep. 45 (S3 Ep 11): ACCOMPLICE! — the club reads the film straight through: the AIDS-twist plot walked beat by beat, the Lyle-as-Himself's-accomplice wink landing at its exact dosing-morning placement, and Hal's snowed-in excavation of his own memory (pp. ~944–950)
- an online forum — full-history archive digest
- “I Am in Here”: A Comparative Reading of David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest and Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis